The CIA claimed that Adilim did not end against politics, but because of “multiple complaints” from CIA staff about her actions at work.
A federal judge rejected an emergency bid by Dr. Terry Adilim to halt termination from the CIA and rejected her claim that political activists coordinated retaliatory shootings for their role in enforcing the military’s Covid-19 vaccine orders.
Her lawsuit includes CIA, Likelyn, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Conservative Nonprofit Future, Inc. was named the defendant. It allegedly breached due process, honour damage, breach of contract and violating privacy laws due to alleged leaks in relation to her firing of Breitbart News.
“The plaintiffs accurately identify the accusations against Ivan Reichlin, a non-government actor, not the CIA, who accused Ivan Reichlin of adjusting the dismissal through a scheme of honor and political influence,” the lawyer wrote. “An allegation of exaggerated and untrue claim that it is, let alone a claim worthy of an injunctive order, does not actually constitute a viable claim against the federal defendant.”
Related Stories
The Justice Department confirmed that Adilim’s name appeared on Reichlin’s so-called “deep state target list,” but said this has nothing to do with the CIA decision. “There is no reason other than the close timing of Ms. Rumer’s visit to the White House and the CIA’s communication of a termination decision to the plaintiffs, suggesting that the two are linked,” Filing said.
The CIA alleged that Adilim did not end against politics, but that “multiple complaints” from CIA staff ended due to “multiple complaints” about “inappropriate and harassment” behavior at work.
Adilim, who served as Secretary of Defense on Health Affairs and signed key policy documents enabling the Pentagon duties, became the focus of her extensive political calculations, even if the CIA had maintained her fire.
A soldier is watching another soldier receive his Covid-19 vaccine from the Army Preventive Health Services in Fort Knox, Kentucky on September 9, 2021. John Cherry/Getty Images
In her complaints, Adilim argued that being fired weeks ago to qualify for federal retirement would be irreparable harm, and that she was slandered after decades of public service and put her family at risk.
The CIA said the decision was internal and legal and was based on employee complaints rather than political pressure.
In response to the May 9 ruling, Adilim’s lawyer Kevin Carroll told the Epoch Times in an emailed statement.
The case remains aggressive in federal courts, but without the injunction she was sought, Adirim’s termination is set to go as planned.
