They wrote despite repeated assertions that “supporters of the bill have changed their arguments and fundamentally changed the bill.”
A group of Labour lawmakers criticized Kim Reidbeater’s proposal to replace the approval of a High Court judge with a panel of the Suicide Assistance Bill.
Currently, the terminal adult (end of life) bill requires approval from two doctors and a high court judge.
Leadbeater, which sponsored the private members’ bill, said he wanted to replace the High Court judge element with a voluntary dying aid committee. This includes social workers and psychiatrists, chaired by a High Court judge or former senior judge, removes the High Court guarantees that oversee all cases.
On Tuesday, a group of 10 Labour MPs who voted against the bill in their second reading said “despite repeated guarantees” despite the preservation of these safeguards.
It continued: “But despite repeated guarantees just a few days ago, supporters of the bill have changed their arguments and fundamentally changed the bill.
Related Stories
Protection “collapse”
Leadbeater, a Labour MP in Spen Valley, announced her plans in an opinion piece released in the Guardian on Monday night.
She said the changes would respond to evidence given early in the committee’s process and would make her bill “even more robust.”
Several lawmakers from across the political spectrum criticized the move, including Florence Eshalomi, one of the 10 Labour MPs who co-signed statements criticizing the proposal.
Christian behavior research and education (care) called the fluid nature of discussion “the cause of concern.”
A spokesman for Care said, “Where to be allowed to die, legal requirements have been relaxed or completely relaxed, as campaigners pursue easier access by more groups of people.
“The direction of travel is always liberalised and we expect British law to develop in this way. Parliament doesn’t need to take this risk.”
Committee
Leadbeater’s proposal came a day before the committee, where 23 lawmakers of the bill began scrutiny by row.
The exact language is unknown as the proposal has not yet been officially added to the revised paper. However, several lawmakers on the committee, including from Labour, raised concerns over the proposal that they said would change the nature of the legislation.
They also expressed concern about the amount of written evidence still coming to the committee and the time they have to read the new revisions that are continuing to be submitted.
On October 16th, 2024, members of the Distant Voices, Christian Concerns, Christian Medical Fellowship and SPUC will gather to protest the Suicide Assistance Bill in Westminster, London. Lucy North/PA Wire
Conservative MP Danny Kruger said the lead beater’s proposal would “change the entire scope of the proposed bill in the second reading,” and asked if the committee could postpone, members read the evidence and I was asked if the lead beater’s plan could be submitted and allowed to read before scrutiny of the bill began.
Committee Chairman Esther McVay said the postponement would be up to the committee to vote.
“It’s a normal practice for what was submitted when evidence came in and when it came in,” McVey told MPS.
However, she said that she would seek advice from the clerk because of the large amount of evidence and the importance of the bill.
The conservative MP kit Malthouse, which supports the bill, is a “natural process” of scrutinizing information, a “natural process” for information to continue flowing, and is even more controversial during the reporting stage of the bill. He added that there is.
The committee phase is expected to last several weeks, with the bill returning with the entire House of Representatives oversight in the reporting phase in April.
