Since President Donald Trump has enacted a pledge in a campaign to crack down on illegal immigrants, the emotions among readers in the epoch era are overwhelmingly agreed with the strict execution of illegal immigrants and expulsion of the country. There are some nuances.
The online survey conducted on January 29-30 is a total of 54,144 respondents, and it depends on the powerful support for forced repatriation of illegal immigrants, especially as a security threat, and depends on public assistance. I have revealed to do it.
However, the results also emphasize how immigration policies should be dealt with in the United States, visa overstayers, and those who have long -term relationships with employment.
The majority supports large -scale expulsion, but a considerable accident condition continues to be the best way to balance execution, economic and humanitarian considerations. It reflects the discussion.
With the increase in Trump’s immigration efforts, the overwhelming support for readers in the Epoch Times is the fact that the overwhelming support for readers, employment, employment, family bonds, and potential threats to national security. It indicates that there is an important distinction based on.
The illegal immigrant from Haiti will pass through the gaps of the walls of the border wall of Yuma, Arizona, from Mexico on December 10, 2021. John Moore/Getty Image
A wide range of support for expulsion of abroad
The decisive majority of Epock Times readers believe that illegal immigrants should expel the country. He was asked to answer direct questions, “Should illegal immigrants be expelled abroad?” The overwhelming reaction was “yes”, and 81.3 % of the respondents supported overseas expulsion.
However, 16.7 % supported overseas expulsions only after legal examination of the case -by -case, not automatically deletion. The minority (0.9 %) believes that the expulsion of abroad should be fully strengthened and illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay, but 1.1 % were not convinced.
The support of illegal immigrants, which depends on the public aid program, is high, and 88.5 % supported the removal, enabling 8.5 % to stay under certain conditions. Only 1.7 % opposed the expulsion of the government’s assistance, and 1.4 % were not convinced.
The strongest support for overseas expulsion was directed to illegal immigrants with flags as a threat to potential national security, and 93 % supported immediate removal. In addition, 6.7 % supported forced repatriation, but only after a thorough investigation, 0.2 % opposed the removal, 0.15 % was uncertain.
These results not only emphasize a wide range of support for severe immigration, but also suggest a subtle approach.
On January 10, 2024, we monitor the border intersection in Jacomba, California. John Fredrix/Epoch Times
Expansen people who comply or hire the law
Most of the respondents are fully supported by overseas expulsion, but their opinions are divided in consideration of those who have no criminal history other than illegally entering the country.
Premium pick
The majority (63.4 %) forced illegal immigrants who did not commit other crimes. However, nearly one -third (29.6 %) was open to allow such individuals to stay under certain conditions. I completely opposed the depth of 3.9 %, but I was not convinced that 3 % was convinced.
When employment was considered, public opinion was further divided. Opinion polls supported 58.3 % of Epock Times readers to forcibly repatriate beneficially employed illegal immigrants, but 34.7 % of them were satisfied with specific conditions, such as obtaining labor permissions and paying taxes. He believed that he should be allowed to stay in the case. Only 4 % opposed the completely repatriation of such workers, and 2.9 % were not convinced.
These answers are still supported by the majority, but a considerable minority recognizes the economic role of illegal immigrant workers, and supports practical solutions for large -scale overseas expulsion in that case. It suggests to do.
VISA inventory and people with us
The voting also investigated an attitude toward illegal immigrants with an important relationship with the United States, and revealed a more split posture.
Of the respondents, 57 % of the respondents supported the expulsion of illegal immigrants with a US -born child, but 33.9 % made it possible to stay in a specific situation. 5.1 % was completely opposed to the depth of 4.1 %, and 5.1 % was not convinced.
When asked about illegal immigrant children without a companion, 55.1 % of respondents thought they should be allowed to stay and allow 14.5 % to be allowed. A considerable 30.4 % remained uncertain.
The illegal immigrant from El Salvador stands on December 7, 2015 next to the US border guards near Riogland City, Texas. According to the border guard agent, many pregnant women illegally intersect with the United States illegally and delay their conditions. The intention of giving birth to a baby in the United States to acquire the gorgeous citizenship. John Moore/Getty Image
For illegal immigrants who have lived in the United States for over 10 years, 40 % supported overseas expulsion. However, a slightly higher share (41.6 %) was preferred, and we were able to stay in the country. Another 18.5 % was not convinced.
Visa’s opinion on employment was almost evenly divided. Opinion polls showed that 42 % of respondents supported immediate expulsion, and 40 % supported visa overstayers to update their visa. In addition, 15.1 % of them supported them, and such individuals could stay under certain conditions such as employment and family bonds, but 2.9 % were not convinced.
This disparity suggests that many Americans see an extension different from the illegal border intersections, and how much of a policy solution that makes it possible for excessive visa to stay in the country. There is an openness of.
Exile applicants, gorgeous citizenship, and other factors
Respondents widely supported the expulsion of the country, but their opinions relieved when humanitarian factors were considered.
A total of 48 % of the respondents said that illegal immigrants should not escape war or persecution, should not be expelled abroad, but should be allowed to apply for asylum instead. However, 37.4 % supported foreign expulsion, but 14.6 % was not convinced.
Natural disasters were different, and 64 % believed that illegal immigrants should still be expelled abroad. In contrast, 9.8 % opposed the expulsion of those affected by natural disasters, but 26 % were convinced.
After an agreement between the United States and Venezuela in Haringen, Texas on October 18, 2023, a woman in Stackle is lightly beaten before boarding the illegal Venezuelan’s first export flight. VERONICA G. CARDENAS/AFP via Getty Images
In consideration of national security concerns, 53.2 % of the respondents said that they should give priority to illegal immigrants from non -US allies, but 42.6 % have decided to export their nationality. I don’t think it should affect.
Finally, when asked about delicate sites such as churches, hospitals, and schools, 84.9 % stated that such places should not be ongoing. On the other hand, 9.8 % believed that these sites should remain protected from the invasion, and 5.3 % were convinced.
Opinion polls are collaborated with the strong people’s preferences for immigration execution, but also reveals important areas of discussions, especially in visa, economic contributions, and fleeing wars. Expansion of the country remains a dominant view, but the meaningful percentage of respondents express openness to allow illegal immigrants to allow them to stay in the United States under certain conditions.
