This is the first step in what is expected to be a long-term fight to bring about a majority of Republican thin homes along a single package approach.
WASHINGTON – On February 25, US House of Representatives gives the House Speaker a green light with the blueprint of Mike Johnson (R-La.) on a massive budget package to run President Donald Trump’s agenda I did.
The House of Representatives approved the resolution at 217.–215 Vote. Related House committees allow them to find at least $1.5 trillion in spending cuts, $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and $4 trillion bumps to the debt cap.
Only Republican Rep. Thomas Massey (R-KY.) voted against the resolution, while one Democrat, Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), is separated for medical reasons.
The vote on the proposal came just minutes after leadership announced at the last minute that they were pulling it off the floor. Many lawmakers who had left the Capitol had to turn around to hurry back to their rooms.
Republicans clapped after the final Republican vote was thrown in. Many individuals personally shaking Johnson’s hands, marking the political victory they achieved after weeks of skepticism from both Senate Republicans and political commentators.
Passing the resolution means work will be sent to multiple committees in the House, with the allocation to find potential spending cuts and draft legislative proposals in areas related to border security, defense, energy and tax. there is.
Related Stories
The success of the vote was the first of what would be expected to be a long-term battle to line up razor-like Republican homes along a single package to enact Trump’s agenda. It only represents steps. The current composition of the home means Republicans can spare a single asylum on high stakes votes.
This factor has more to inform Johnson and House Republicans’ single package approach than any other, with all major Republican priorities being passed in a large single bill.
But Johnson’s victory in moving forward with his proposals prevails in the difficulties of his job.
At a meeting counting both the Blue District Republicans and the deep red country and suburban district Republicans, we found agreements on a big controversy.
Republicans were divided into cuts
Prior to the initial vote on the blueprint, the issue became apparent on occasion for totally contradictory reasons, as several Republicans expressed their opposition.
For example, Nicole Mariotakis (RN.Y.), Jeff Van Drew (RN.J.), and Don Bacon (R-Neb.) are concerned about the packaging due to the potential impact on Medicaid. It has been revealed that there is.
Under the conditions of the blueprint, the House Energy and Commerce Committee is expected to find at least $880 billion in spending cuts on spending cuts for its umbrella programs and institutions, including Medicaid.
Meeting the close to $1 trillion topline would effectively require a cut to popular healthcare qualification programs. This could be a political suicide, especially for some Republicans in Medicaid-dependent districts.
But on the other side of the Republican ideological spectrum, Victoria Spartz rep (R-ind.) and Massy also expressed concern.
Spartz has particularly led to greater investigations and demands for reductions to Medicaid. Spartz suggests that the automated program’s funding could potentially be full of abuse.
Meanwhile, Massey noted that a budget plan in which a $4.5 tax cut far out of the current proposal’s $1.5 trillion spending cut will have a long-term negative impact on the deficit.
However, all these asylums have finally reached the proposal, except for Massie, but the ideological disparities between them likely continue as the lower chamber moves into the long process of drafting the final bill. It must be.
Senators have doubts
Senate Republicans are open about skepticism that Johnson can complete the job.
Last week, the Senate passed the first draft of a two-part budget plan that punts tax issues while immediately changing borders, defense, energy budgets and policies.
Senate majority leader John Tune (Rs.D.) said the Senate’s counter-proposer was merely aimed at providing “options” to the White House.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (Rs.C.), a leading actor in the Senate’s two-track approach, openly demonstrates that Johnson believes he cannot pass a single package into the lower chamber. It’s there.
Four years after a minority, Republicans are now narrowing their 53-seat majority in the upper room.
Nevertheless, both Thune and Graham show that if Johnson can pull it out, a single huge package will be their preference.
Whether Congress will eventually occupy the House or take up the Senate approach will largely depend on the outcome of back-room hugging and negotiations within the House Republican Conference in the coming weeks.
Johnson said he did not consider the Senate proposal to be “Plan B” ahead of Tuesday’s voting series.
“There’s no plan,” Johnson said. “This is the only plan we’re implementing.”
Johnson said he hopes to make the final passage by May and complete the package work by April.
