According to Michael Sheribridge, recent live fire exercises by PLA naval warships in the Tasman Sea expose “obvious” issues.
According to Australian Strategic Analysis (SAA) defense expert Michael Shoridge, Australia is no longer able to rely on distances that protect Israel and Ukraine, so it is necessary to develop land missile defense systems that protect Israel and Ukraine. .
The trio of vessels named Task Group 107 includes heavily armed Ren High Class Cruiser (named Zuniii), Jiang Kai Class Frigate (Hengyan), and Fuji Class refill container weishanhu.
According to Sheebridge, these ships have long-range ships and surface-to-air missiles, which pose risks to ships and aircraft. However, they also have the ability to attack targets on the land.
“Iron and Door” Australian Edition
The SAA recommends that Australia “adopt a significantly expanded layered air and missile defense programme to have the ability to protect bases and key infrastructure and install them in major population centers.” It’s there.
Related Stories
The government “must protect military bases and assets as Australia’s population and broader economic infrastructure are vulnerable,” he warns.
Successive governments have already spent billions of dollars on upgrades to Australia’s defense sites, but focus on “changes in degraded, aging buildings, services and facilities and accommodating next-generation ships, aircraft and vehicles.” I’m guessing it.
Nothing is done to allow them to be able to withstand missile and drone strikes that could negate them and destroy very expensive weapon systems.
“We need to order from Australian counter drone systems and longer lead systems like the US Patriot missile defense system. Quick negotiations are needed to bring Israeli systems, such as iron domes and arrows, to Australia. is.
Double use facilities in northern Australia
Shoebridge also calls for the military to have the means to rapidly disperse civilian ports, airfields and facilities and turn existing facilities to dual-use sites that support the mining and resource sectors.
“In our view, the increased risk of regional conflict over the last decade has led to the development of “green fields” of airfields and naval ports as a solution to increase the challenges of ADF and alliances in northern Australia. That means that you no longer have the luxury to plan,” Shoebridge wrote. .
Australian Army Fuel Experts from 1st Combat Services will support battalion work alongside oil operators of the British Commando Logistics Regiment and refuel Battle Group Tiger vehicles at Timber Creek in the Northern Territory during the 2024 movement I will.
Fuel supply is still a problem
As ADF remains equipped with fossil fuels until at least 2050, the SAA said it would be possible for all military-run sites to expand diesel and aviation gas storage during the conflict, both ADF-based and civilian facilities. Recommended.
Australia currently has enough liquid fuel on land. It lasts for about a month.
Increase the defense budget to 3%
But that’s not enough.
The government should also invest in the land refining of two important fuels (diesel and aviation gas) for transport and military use. This will allow the country and its defense forces to maintain operation during long-term conflicts.
Strategic Analysis Australia needs to lift defense budgets to 2.4%, up to 3%, over a much shorter time frame, to achieve the goals outlined in the report. They say there is.
