Authorities classify withdrawals as a class that I remember, indicating the risk of “severe, adverse health effects.”
Common sense soaps in New Hampshire are reminiscent of cosmetic beef flour products because they are manufactured without federal testing and can be misunderstood as being suitable for human consumption, according to the Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS). Masu.
In total, four products have been recalled under Lady May Brand, all in different sizes, sold in bathtubs and jars. Items were shipped to wholesalers and retailers across the country.
FSIS said it determined that women had contracted common sense to produce items that were recalled between October 16, 2024 and February 6, 2025.
“Beef tallow products contain labels of nutrition facts, which will guide people to believe that this product is safe for human consumption,” FSI said in a statement. “Common Sense Soap does not own federal testing grants and is not permitted to produce products intended for human consumption.”
Beef fat is used in cooking and skin care. Common sense and women are the sellers of cosmetics and personal care products. “We are worried that some of the recalled products may be found in consumer pantry,” FSI said.
Related Stories
Recalls are classified as “high-class 1” under the highest USDA classification of the three recall categories. According to FSIS, a Class I recall is issued “there is a reasonable probability that product use will cause serious health effects or death.”
According to the agency, there have been no confirmed reports of side effects among people using the product.
“These products should be thrown away or returned to where they are purchased,” FSIS said in the announcement. “Anyone who is worried about a response should contact their healthcare provider.”
Customers with questions regarding the recall can contact Ready Mayow.
The Epoch era reached out to Kontrow’s soap and the woman Meirou for comments, but did not receive a reply by publication time.
Fund reduction
The recall is because federal agencies are being scrutinized for food testing and safety efforts.
There are at least 30 federal laws governing the safety and quality of food supplies in the country, and the law is governed by 15 federal agencies, including the FSIS, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control. Prevent.
The agency has taken certain steps to achieve its foodborne disease reduction targets, but “recently available data shows that the FDA and FSI have not achieved their targets.” The report states. Of the seven annual performance targets listed by GAO, no agency achieved the target.
For example, FSI was intended to reduce the proportion of poultry samples containing salmonella bacteria by 4%. It ultimately rose 22%.
Similarly, the FDA was unable to reduce the incidence of salmonella infections acquired in the country where it was diagnosed to that target level.
“They will perform most of the food inspections reported by the FDA, including 50% of food processing facility inspections, 90% of agricultural safety inspections and 100% of retail food inspections.” The lawmaker wrote. “These tests are conducted at a much lower cost to taxpayers than if the FDA directly conducted them.”
Potential FDA cuts could “significantly affect” the US food safety system, as some state programs could be reduced or completely terminated, the letter said I stated.
