How to not manage the federal bureaucracy

The problem of governance from myths, not the fact, is that you break what is not broken, and you’ll be completely opposed to what you have tried to achieve.

The Trump administration’s personnel decision is driven by myths by the myths that the bureaucracy system is the government’s extra branch, powerful, left -sided, and deciding to hinder changes.

The political opposition, Jimmy Carter and the Ronald Reagan, opposed Washington and then raised the government. It’s easy for government employees to say that they are a problem. It suits myths.

There is no lobby in the government’s labor, and its union has a law limit. They are subject to myths and have to silently take it.

The myths of bureaucracy are truly myths. But they suppress good governments. If you are told that you are a problem, you may want to act.

The government may need trimming. It looks like the personnel are excessive, but not a saw, but a scalpel.

The Trump administration’s invitation to the federal government employees is counterproductive to acquire or accept the uncertainty of the face.

Anyone who is familiar with the idea of ​​reducing labor by binging knows what will happen. The dross remains.

Reducing federal salaries by tens of thousands of workers is not much reduced. Brain, time server.

I have been told by the government. Work has already stopped because workers who have lost their morale discuss their options. The government’s efficiency has declined and its productivity has decreased.

The attack was following another de facto attack on the government’s most productive. In general, it may be better for more employees to work in their office, but not.

Again, there are talent factors.

Think of all dedicated scientists and engineers. The government employs tens of thousands of people in places such as NASA, NIH, USDA, NSA, and private military military. In the age of computers and artificial intelligence, these knowledge workers are noble. Many are more productive at home, and in recent years they have been working for more than two days a week.

Returned orders to the office are destructive and counterproductive. The workplace has changed and we have changed. It wasn’t five years ago.

The challenge is to find a new way to manage remote work, not expeling remote work.

The problem of returning to the administration’s office is that one size does not fit all. Unless you accept a more useful solution than useful, there are rarely simple solutions for complex issues. It can cure tooth decay by pulling out all teeth and fitting fake teeth, but it is almost not a solution.

The officers know that his army is an army that saves his life. They are common problems, but they are the fighters he or she has on his back. With the federal workers.

In an interview, the Cabinet Secretary told me that his staff was “lame, blind, stop.” When he returned to the office before writing the line, his office called for me to not use a quote.

Criticism of the staff is a poor way to make the most of them. It is the opposite leadership.

Every day, the country is operated by civil servants. It is a costume that supplies or defeats clothes. It is a deep, evil, secret organization, an important power, and humiliates its political master. It is not a monolithic whole, it is organized and has its own motivation.

It is a silent backbone of all countries: individual organization.

LLEWELLYN KING is an executive producer and host of PBS’s “White House Clonicle”. He wrote it for Insidesources.com.